NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4: Mental Health Disorder Occurrence During COVID-19
Given the challenges posed by the COVID-19 epidemic, the claim that mental health is critical to overall well-being is increasingly insufficient. The increasing incidence of mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety highlights the importance of having robust support systems. Even with greater awareness of the problem, persistent problems like stigma and limited
access to services still hinder effective care (Gupta & Sahoo, 2020). The goal of the NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 is to examine a difficult and rationally demanding issue, like mental health care in general, using an understanding of educational ideas and analytical skills. The goal of identifying causes, evaluating the effects, and recommending solutions is to improve mental wellness care systems in light of significant worldwide collective issues.
The Description of the Problem of Health Care
A serious mental health disaster brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic is worsening existing issues and contributing to the development of certain unforeseen conditions. Meherali et al. (2021) state that isolation from society, financial struggle, fear of sickness, and mourning for the deceased are some of the causes of the high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression that individuals experience globally. Accessing mental health help would have been challenging if there had not been lockdowns and overworked medical facilities, which would have dislocated many customary sources of support. The cycle of pain and isolation is further prolonged by the negative perception attached to mental health illnesses, which keeps people from taking aggressive measures to address them. Gupta and Sahoo (2020). The need for targeted therapies and strategies to support mental health is emphasized in this topic, which is a key focus of NHS FPX 4000 assessment 4 and is covered in ethics in healthcare articles.
The growth of more people seeking help for mental diseases has led to a greater awareness of the systemic problems in the provision of mental health care, putting additional strain on the already scarce assets. It is expected that psychological impacts will endure and necessitate long-term treatment even after vaccination campaigns and the easing of limitations caused by the pandemic (Singh, 2021). Prolonged problems with current health care are highlighted by the institutional flaws that support disparities in access, quality, and results, which are equally as problematic as the occurrence of disorders associated with mental health (Meherali et al., 2021). A thorough grasp of the socioeconomic and emotional components of these complex issues is crucial. Additionally, creative methods of policy improvement, community involvement, and delivery of services are supported.
Problem or Issue Analysis
A COVID-19-related mental health problem represents some of the most complicated issues that may affect many people, as well as society as a whole. These problems can possibly affect this issue both in terms of difficulty and depth. First, the disease has exacerbated preexisting stressors and generated new stressors (Kaparounaki et al., 2020). The risk of contracting an infection, worrying about the forthcoming infections, and being separated from a loved one is already elevated by pre-existing stressors associated with systemic inequity, social isolation, and financial instability.
This has led to the rise of anxiety, depression, as well as other mental-related illnesses, which have strained the coping mechanisms in the minds of people and resulted in an over-saturation of mental services. Second, mental health facilities have been affected by the global epidemic (Singh, 2021). The shutdown protocols, transfer of resources, and infection-related problems resulted in the widespread closure of numerous treatment services and
the withdrawal of in-person activities. This emphasizes how crucial DEI and health equality are to guaranteeing that all populations receive equitable care.
The misconception attached to mental health issues, which prevents people from getting therapy out of embarrassment, exacerbates disparities in access to therapy. In addition, due to their ongoing stress from their jobs, worries about becoming ill, moral anguish, and extreme depression, primary healthcare professionals have particular mental health challenges (Meherali et al., 2021). Due to their critical role in reacting to the epidemic and their frequent inability to access proper mental health care, a significant proportion of people experience fatigue, lack of compassion, and stress disorder (Kaparounaki et al., 2020). The mental health issue has broader societal repercussions than merely individual ones. Reduced efficiency, higher medical expenses, and a higher incidence of drug use of drugs and fatality are all linked to poor mental health, which is assessed in the NHS FPX 4000 assessment 4 and discussed in ethical considerations in health care.
Possible Solutions for the Issue
Care models could be one method to address the problem of mental disorders that COVID-19 has made worse. It is expected that integrating mental wellness monitoring and support into primary care will help in connecting the disparities between the physical and psychological well-being (Singh, 2021). This method lessens the negative perception associated with treating mental illnesses and encourages the idea of providing immediate assistance to those in need. Furthermore, if specialized care is required, the patient will obtain it; collaborative approaches to treatment encourage collaboration between psychological professionals and medical professionals, who promptly prescribe to patients.
Patients can now receive mental health care remotely with the help of telehealth, which has been a useful tool during the pandemic (Meherali et al., 2021). According to NHS FPX 4000 assessment 4, this approach offers a promising means of managing long-term mental health conditions, boosting accessibility for treatment, and advancing the well-being of people of all ages.
Authorities and healthcare organizations may engage in telehealth networks to serve people who could be hurt by an embarrassing location or by being unable to move because of disabilities. It will also improve access to essential therapy by redesigning the process of reimbursement for counseling, mental health sessions, and online support networks.
Moreover, telehealth enables individuals to receive therapy in the privacy of their homes, as it does not require the inconvenience of travelling to a physical location to meet with the doctor. Moreover, it is necessary to engage in local projects aimed at helping people with mental disorders with the purpose of local mental health (Gupta & Sahoo, 2020). The programs show the importance of ethics in healthcare by offering useful resources to stimulate mental health and resilience, including wellness sessions and psychological therapies.
The demand for official mental wellness programs can be lessened, and resilience in communities increased by funding the expansion and longevity of such initiatives. Moreover, the steps to reduce stigmatization and improve awareness about mental health need to be included in the overall planning regarding the problem of mental health (Singh, 2021). Educational programs teaching people about mental health disorders, debunking myths, and promoting relief-seeking actions will all ensure a more accepting and welcoming community.
Implications for Ethics of Placing the Solution into Practice
The measures taken to address the state of mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic raise moral concerns regarding autonomy, fairness, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. To begin with, the beneficence principle makes it abundantly evident that it is imperative to behave in the best possible way for people as well as societies (Meherali et al., 2021). Legislators and healthcare providers can show their dedication to reducing suffering and improving mental health by increasing the availability of treatment for mental disorders via integrated care models, telemedicine, and community support programs. The NHS FPX 4000 examination 4 looks at this focus, which is based on principles of ethics in healthcare administration.
By giving priority to mental health in health campaigns, one will prove that people realize how important it is to maintain their mental health as well as realize how important it is to make people feel good and live properly, having a great quality of life. The nonmaleficence principle also makes it a requirement to avoid causing harm to others (Gupta & Sahoo, 2020). Despite the potential benefits of more accessible mental health care, this trend raises important ethical dilemmas in health care by raising the risk of unforeseen outcomes such as privacy invasion, misdiagnosis, or inappropriate treatment.
Additionally, autonomy is necessary in regard to the provision of mental well-being of the population. By providing them with options pertaining to hospital care and the wider population through its telehealth aspects, it empowers citizens to make informed decisions about their healthcare needs and delivery (Gupta & Sahoo, 2020). By being recognized as sovereign, individuals will be capable of making decisions, deciding what modalities of treatment to employ, and be able to access resources and information that will prove useful to them. Finally, the question of justice implies that it is much more significant that all people have equal opportunities to gain the advantages of having the opportunity to receive psychological care,
regardless of socioeconomic status or place of residence. The NHS FPX 4000 assessment 4 will prioritize the reduction of care quality and disparities in care access because vulnerable groups should be offered adequate support (Meherali et al., 2021). Specific action, budgeting, and policy reform might be required to eliminate the systemic barriers that prevent dealing with the issue of equality in mental health care treatment and end the neglect of ethical issues in healthcare.
Conclusion
The mental health condition was worsened due to COVID-19, and timely and effective treatment is extremely important. In the NHS FPX 4000 assessment 4 domain, by investing in community support systems, telehealth services, and internet-based systems, we can perhaps attempt to build more comprehensive and extensive systems of mental health. Patients’ and organizations’ well-being, the standard and availability of care, and lessening the negative image attached to mental illnesses should all be priorities. By incorporating ethical principles into healthcare and promoting DEI and health equity, caregivers can create a culture of support and compassion while also enhancing psychological wellness for everyone.
References
Gupta, S., & Sahoo, S. (2020). Pandemic and mental health of the front-line healthcare workers: A review and implications in the Indian context amidst COVID-19. General Psychiatry, 33(5), e100284. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100284
Kaparounaki, C. K., Patsali, M. E., Mousa, D.-P. V., Papadopoulou, E. V. K., Papadopoulou, K.
- K., & Fountoulakis, K. N. (2020). University students’ mental health amidst the COVID-19 quarantine in Greece. Psychiatry Research, 290(113111), 113111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113111
Meherali, S., Punjani, N., Louie-Poon, S., Abdul Rahim, K., Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., & Lassi, Z.
- (2021). Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and past Pandemics: A rapid systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073432
Singh, G. P. (2021). Psychosocial and mental health issues of the migrants amidst COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A narrative review. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 025371762110448. https://doi.org/10.1177/025

